Taekwon Do is defined by the Founder of Taekwon-Do:
So when does a beginner learn how to jump, fly, kick or smash with the foot?
There is the front kick in Doh-san (the third form in the Chang Hon set of patterns), and the side kick in Won-hyo, the very next form. However, the next few only seem to feature variations of these two kicks. Only in Hwa-rang and Choong-Mu, the eighth and ninth featured patterns do you see a roundhouse kick and then a jumping side-kick.
This article looks at possible reasons for the above discrepancy. The objective is to help the practitioner understand how Taekwon Do forms positioned kicks as effective weapons. To do this, we will explore the issue from three perspectives:
We will conclude by forming some recommendations aligned with the practice of Taekwon Do patterns.
From information on the A-KaTo website (a-kato.org), we see that in the mid 1950s, there was effort to "unify the many" and disparate martial art schools in Korea. The Founder of Taekwon Do, General Choi Hong Hi proposed the name 'Taekwon Do' and was the sole architect of the original set of Taekwon Do patterns. This we can confirm from a recent interview with International Ch'ang Hon Taekwon-Do Federation President, GM Kong Young Il, a 9th Degree practitioner and former first generation student of General Choi's (Ictf.web.com).
While the design of Taekwon Do must have drawn from existing practice, one cannot discount the influence that General Choi had on the formation of this new system. Some questions that may be asked in this vein:
In a recount of Taekwon Do's history (Morris 1999), it seemed that Taekwon Do's and the General's "greatest turning point" was during the Korean War in 1952 where President Syngman Rhee "ordered his military chiefs of staff to require all Korean soldiers to receive training in the martial arts." To this, we can assume that General Choi, as a military officer responsible to oversee such training and development, must have had to establish quality standards and ensure that soldiers learn effective martial skills that he demonstrated to President Rhee.
The first main point is this: Taekwon Do had to be taught to a great many soldiers and had to maintain the highest standards of effectiveness. This means the system that General Choi had to create would have to integrate itself into an existing military training system (see Appendix: Schedule of Military Training), and take into account a soldier's needs while outfitted with heavy military gear.
The design of this system, may have designed the martial art syllabus with no kicks for personnel during their initial basic and/or vocational training. Why? Stuart Anslow (3rd Dan) from Rayners Lane Taekwondo Academy in the UK offers the idea that maybe "hand techniques are easier and quicker to master... than kicking techniques" (Anslow 2001). This ensures that the few devastating techniques taught would actually work when required.
The second stage of training from month 3 or 6 could then introduce one or two 'staple' kicks (along with variations), as evidenced from Doh-san to Toi-gye. This is reasonable if one thinks of the saying 'less is more' for combat personnel wearing heavy boots.
If this is true, then similar to basic military training, the student learns a few techniques at first so that each one learned is an effective weapon.
What is the purpose of Kata? It is a popular understanding that Kata houses tactics that allow a practitioner to learn all the moves necessary for a particular purpose. However, the question still remains -- why only two kicks for the first seven patterns? This may be because the pattern teaches only the required minimum tactics and the more important strategy for a particular combative encounter.
So advice such as from A-KaTo's Mike Proctor Sensei (8th dan) to "raise your arms for coverage when the opponent is closer" should go into the "close quarter combat" pattern. The pattern doesn't have to list down all tactics, but cover the combative situation well enough so that the practitioner can "adapt, improvise, and overcome" during that particular encounter.
On this note, I remember one lesson by A-KaTo's Paul Hinkley Sensei (5th Dan) discussing the kicks we were practicing. He put forth that many techniques in the martial arts teach parameters of body movement. What Mr Hinkley meant is that if you were taught a front kick delivered on a vertical plane, and then a roundhouse kick delivered on a horizontal plan, all slices between those two "parameters" would describe an infinite number of variations that are plausible and acceptable.
Drilled then on the front and side kick, beginning practitioners schooled on Chang Hon patterns would first have the vertical plane from the front kick, and secondly a side thrusting motion. In addition, observing the roundhouse/turning kick of more skilled practitioners, they could apply different variations where necessary. These building block moves could conceivably produce almost all the kicking variations required for targets waist high and below.
If this line of argument holds true, then forms introduce kicking techniques with the knowledge that all strikes are strategically initiated. Rather than mere recipes of how to do a specific strike or all possible strikes, the forms show possibilities for practitioners to innovate and remain effective.
I spent 8 years in my first martial art before joining Bryan Robbins Sensei's (7th Dan) class. I was previously trained to have beautiful, fast and powerful kicks. Only problem was because I came from a "light" contact style, it seemed I wasn't able to land any of my techniques during my first few months of sparring at Southern Methodist University.
Yet, a person trained in kicks like myself uses kicks more frequently when learning to spar, irrespective of whether the kicks land. The reason is that kicking "imposes respect of distance" (Yates 1988 17), keeping one "safely" away from an opponent trying to knock you out.
After several months out of my comfort zone, I found increasing success with my kicks and hand techniques. Both seemed to improve simultaneously as I began to understand how to calibrate and land techniques. As an aside, given my previous training and flexibility, I found no greater difficulty striking with simple kicks as I could with sophisticated kicks.
Here is an informal list of success factors in striking a person with a kick.
How much of the above can I attribute either directly or indirectly to effective forms practice? The table below shows my thoughts of whether forms have a positive, negative or no effect on the ability for a person to kick.
Table 1 Effect of Forms Practice on Kicking Ability
| No | Success Factors | Justification | Positive | No Effect | Negative | |
| 1 | Set of targets | Forms present straightforward targets for hand strikes and do not immediately emphasize targets only accessible by kicks. | x | |||
| 2 | Distancing | There is some distancing training when you apply any technique from the pattern on a training partner. This directly helps distancing for kicks. | x | |||
| 3 | Angle of entry | Related to 'Set of targets' above, forms present straightforward targets for hand strikes and do not immediately emphasize targets only accessible by kicks. | x | |||
| 4 | Vectors | Related to 'Set of targets' above, forms present straightforward targets for hand strikes and do not immediately emphasize targets only accessible by kicks. | x | |||
| 5 | Non-telegraphed moves | Patterns are about single techniques with little time-pressure on the practitioner; there is a low chance that moves will be telegraphed. Taking such movement into consideration will improve your chances of starting the kick without the opponent really understanding how your leg is going to travel. | x | |||
| 6 | Blind spots | Related to 'Set of targets' above, forms present straightforward targets for hand strikes and do not immediately emphasize targets only accessible by kicks. | x | |||
| 7 | Feinting | Most patterns come with either the idea that each move is a devastating one or allows you to somehow grapple with the opponent. Unless the pattern comes with strategic guidance to mask your intentions, the practitioner will not think to use the preceeding technique as a feint to allow the kick more chance to land. | x | |||
| 8 | Speed modulation | I have not seen any forms (except for the variations I practice) that use speed modulation beyond just 'fast' or 'slow' moves. | x | |||
| 9 | Mobility | I suspect that this issue would be well covered by my WTF friends, but as such the first few patterns seem to encourage short range kicks with a very stable centre of gravity. | x | |||
| 2 | 5 | 2 |
As you can see from the summary figures, I think forms did have some relevance in teaching effective distancing and teaching you how not to telegraph techniques. However, the majority of forms practice seems not to lead to any improvement of kicking ability. In some instances while it does not prevent the skills from forming, I believe it adds little to Speed Modulation and kicking Mobility.
The following table summarizes the issues discussed.
Table 2 Summary of Issues
| Section | Ideas |
| Design of Taekwon Do | Kicks up to Black Belt had a specific training purpose and considered learning and operational issues for the dissemination of skills to the masses. |
| Purpose of the Form | Forms only present basic kicks, and encourage innovation; other drills complement the system. Sophisticated kicks learned later. |
| Successful Kicking | Successful kicking comes about from considerable practice; the overlap between what is taught in forms is tenuous when exploring more sophisticated kicking methods. |
I believe that a solid grounding in forms practice makes up the "true essence" (Yates 1988 vii) of effective Taekwon Do practice. Practitioners looking at developing a range of sophisticated kicking techniques beyond this should bear in mind the following ideas prompted from the above discussion:
During a recent senior belt grading I asked what is the difference between the first side kick in Won-hyo and the second.
While there is no one answer, my take on the question is that the first side kick is a reactionary one where your opponent has thrown a mid level kick. The step back is to move the body out of the way of the oncoming strike, and pullback of hands to the "teacup" position is either an attempt to control the kick or an elbow strike from the side to the oncoming leg. The first side kick is thus thrown "in reaction" or "defensively" to an oncoming strike and can aim anywhere from mid section down to support leg.
The second side kick while also featuring the same "hands in teacup position" during the kick is done after a reverse hand striking technique. In this situation one can imagine several strikes toward the opponent, with opponent stumbling or pressured backwards. The hand pullback could be an attempt to control an extended arm and side kick is done from back leg. This kick is done for power and is intended to finish the encounter.
Using this comparative approach for patterns, if I had to form an instructional variation based on "response to an oncoming kick" and involving a jump kicking exercise, it might be with the student having a sidewards trajectory to bypass the oncoming strike. Otherwise a forward jumping technique after opponent disengages may be doable. This approach provides for the jumping requirement in the definition provided by the Founder, and can be re-applied to other aspects as needed.
Just identifying a technique by name may not be sufficient in martial arts. How many times have you seen black belts use basic techniques and totally dominate sparring sessions? While a cliche, one must "go beyond" the technique in order to draw the answers we are looking for.
- - - - -
Colin Wee instructor of Hikaru Ryu Gendai Budo in Western Australia (http://www.hikarudojo.com) has been trained primarily by Sensei Bryan Robbins of the American Karate and Taekwon Do Organisation. Colin is a 4th degree black belt with over 20 years of experience in the martial arts and was previously a national representative and coach in Archery. Colin is passionate about the Chang Hon system of Taekwon Do, but finds significant interest in delivering self-defence courses he has continually developed over the last 15 years. Professionally Colin holds a Master's of Business and Technology degree and is currently working on IT projects. Send questions or comments to colin@hikarudojo.com.
A-kato.org, 'A Brief History From Asia to America and the A-Kato' available at http://www.a-kato.org/history.html
Anslow S, 2001, 'Patterns: Are you missing the point?' as printed in Taekwon-Do and Korean Martial Arts March 2001, available at http://www.raynerslanetkd.com/ARTICLES_Pattern_Apps.html
Ictf-web.com, 'An Interview with Grand Master Kong Young Il, IX Degree' by Stuart Anslow Copyright 2003-2005 International Ch'ang Hon Taekwon-Do Federation available at http://www.ictf-web.com/interview-01.html
Itf-information.com, 'Definition of Taekwon-do: Taekwon-do ... A Way of Life' Fifth Edition 1999 available at http://www.itf-information.com/information16.htm
Morris GR, 1999, 'The History of Taekwondo,' A Report for Recommendation Black Belt Testing 1994 available at http://www.worldtaekwondo.com/history.htm
Yates KD, 1988, 'The Complete Book of Taekwon Do Forms,' Paladin Press, available at http://www.a-kato.org/books.html
My understanding of general military training involves three main periods: basic, vocational and advanced training. Each of these periods span about 3 months. All military personnel would typically undergo the basic military training (BMT) unless they were part of an infantry unit, which undergoes about 9 months of training. After BMT you are vocationalised; for instance you can train further as a radio signaller or a medic. Officer cadets are trained for the full 9 months.
back to articles
www.akato.org - the american karate and tae kwon do organization